Closed mcharg closed 4 years ago
Part of the issue is that we're calling the "state and local governments" recipient "county". We then need to think about what happens if you organize by county after selecting a state. We'll need a line item for the state amount that isn't tied to a county.
What we have now is a line for disbursements to the state, which I think works well.
Here's a proposal that drops the ability to filter by county, only allows selecting or grouping by a state if you pick state & local recipient, and then have a "local recipient" column available for grouping that includes the state and county level.
Closing in favor of #718
If you group by recipient, it only shows county level.
If you group by state, it only shows state level.
Grouping shouldn't change the data that shows, it should just change how it's organized. Something is mislabeled here because the numbers are the same in both these instances.