Closed ascbot closed 5 years ago
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Tammy Becker (Tammy Becker) Original Date: 2013-01-02T22:47:49Z
This is a possibly related to an issue that had been resolved previously. Refer to the related 'closed' post.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Jeff Anderson (Jeff Anderson) Original Date: 2013-01-02T23:24:33Z
Not related. The name displayed depend on the resolution of the image. Therefore a global mosaic will not show all names but as you zoom in you will see names of features in that zoom window (much like GoogleMaps does as you zoom in/out names appear/disappear).
Further discussions with Mark indicate it may be a -180/180 vs 0/360 issue because the IAU nomenclature system for the moon is -180/180 and Mars is 0/360. I think most testing was done with Mars.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Lynn Weller (Lynn Weller) Original Date: 2013-01-03T00:20:30Z
I just opened /usgs/cpkgs/isis3/data/base/dems/ulcn2005_clean_0001.cub in the public version of qview and nomenclature appears on the entire planet. The LongitudeDomain=180 and the CenterLongitude=0.0. There is a little bit of a gap for several longitudes centered on longitude 8 that's odd, but I'm not sure it is wrong.
I also just checked out a Messenger mosaic (/work/projects/messenger/lweller/Monochrome/Networks/DOY_2011095_2012192/Mess_Monochrome_DOY_2011095to2012192_controlled_photG_clon180_200m_Global_track_morphmix.cub that displays nomenclature fine as well. It has LongitudeDomain=360 and CenterLongitude=180.0.
Not sure if this helps any, but since issues where addressed in the closed post Tammy pointed to, I haven't seen any problems with nomenclature.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Jeff Anderson (Jeff Anderson) Original Date: 2013-01-03T16:31:31Z
Any chance we could make that ULCN a 0-360 domain image with map2map and then see what happens?
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Lynn Weller (Lynn Weller) Original Date: 2013-01-03T17:12:00Z
Jeff, do you want the clon to stay as is or be changed to a more appropriate value like 180? Just want to be sure you get what you want.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Jeff Anderson (Jeff Anderson) Original Date: 2013-01-03T20:54:35Z
Yep center longitude of 180 would be more appropriate
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Lynn Weller (Lynn Weller) Original Date: 2013-01-03T22:01:14Z
All there with the domain change. See symbolic links and actual data under /work/users/lweller/Isis3Tests/Qview/Nomen
Ran qview via isis3.4.2. Maybe Mark has an older buggy version?
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Jeff Anderson (Jeff Anderson) Original Date: 2013-01-07T21:33:38Z
It appears that the input cube Mark was using was created with Matlab. It has a 180 domain in the labels even though it is a 0-360 mosaic.
I guess this is not a bug after all so I will close.
Author Name: Jeff Anderson (Jeff Anderson)
Original Assignee: Jeff Anderson
Hi Jeff,
The new annotation feature in qview gets lost when you have a 0-360 domain global mosaic. It only shows names of features with longitudes <=180. I am assuming that the function forgets to shift neg longitudes into positive longitudes? Anderson, Jeffery janderson@usgs.gov
11:18 AM (1 hour ago)
to Mark Hi Mark, So it shows no named features for longitudes above 180? Is that when viewing the entire cube? What happens if you zoom in on longitudes above 180? I know the program only show features at certain scales and as you zoom in more appear. Thanks, Jeff Mark Robinson
11:57 AM (21 minutes ago)
to me On 1/2/13 11:18 AM, Anderson, Jeffery wrote: