Closed chkim-usgs closed 1 week ago
The updates were tested against post #5489 but did not produce a network when it should have. See comments there.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request. View build logs for results.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
~Lynn tested this locally and seem happy with the changes so I think this is good to go~
False alarm, Lynn still wants to test some more
Despite observations made via open post #5540, I think the latest version of the script is worth releasing. It's a great improvement over prior versions and further attempts to find the most suitable use cases will be easier for a user to try with the updated script and xml (containing reference to the new workdir parameter). It's a little difficult testing because of the xml disconnect.
I think moving the segmented cub files from the working directory to /tmp (really not feasible due to NAC file sizes) or a specified workdir needs to be reverted, but that needs to be a new post. I think there is still an issue with creating a final network in some cases, but that needs another look and a new post.
Barring running the script on very large dataset with images having many, many overlaps, I think the script is doing what it should better than before and could be useful for specific use cases. It would be nice to have access to the updates in the latest release if you all agree.
The build and test suite have started for your pull request.
To view your build log, please reference the build with source version: "PR_5565".
Additionally, check the latest "dev" source version to identify existing test failures. Please note that you are not responsible for the test failures that exist on both your PR and the dev branch.
@Kelvinrr Build looks good, test failures match dev's.
Description
The process to retrieve the
from_segments
in this linefrom a
FROMLIST
that contains only one cube outputs this format:so accessing each segment as a list caused a
TypeError
.Added an if/else statement to account for
img_list = 1
sofrom_segments
ultimately outputs this:To reduce redundant overlapping image pairs, I implemented an iteration of @Kelvinrr's generic code with the change in the way the segments are accessed.
Related Issue
Addresses https://github.com/DOI-USGS/ISIS3/issues/5489 & https://github.com/DOI-USGS/ISIS3/issues/5540
How Has This Been Validated?
Types of changes
Checklist:
Licensing
This project is mostly composed of free and unencumbered software released into the public domain, and we are unlikely to accept contributions that are not also released into the public domain. Somewhere near the top of each file should have these words: