[cPP PUBLIC REVIEW] atsec21 - extended component definition formatting

[jvdsn]

What is the location of the document where the comment is made? Appendix C

Comment Type. A = Administrative: the issue is not significant enough to warrant an objection to the cPP if it isn't changed.

What is the comment? Please describe. Editorial. As to formatting conventions, it is stated in cPP that "formatting conventions for selections and assignments in this Appendix are those in [CC2]."

In both CC v3.1 and CC:2022, the assignment and selection operations are presented in italicized text. Some extended SFRs defined in cPP Appendix C, e.g., the FCS_STG_EXT.1, FDP_ITC_EXT.2, use underlined texts.

Describe the proposed solution/edit Investigate if the formatting needs to match CC2022 and if so, change the ECD.

[woodbe]

Summary from call:

• Focus on the ECD first, determine scope of changes (probably just create a pull request).
• Work on determining if, what and how much may need to change in the SFRs themselves for consistency (this could be shunted to later, depending on actual work)