Open BioLaoXu opened 1 year ago
Hi,dear developers,I often use HISTAT2 for RNAseq data analysis, but recently I used the same fastq data(RNAseq,PE50) and the same mapping command to analyze and found that the mapping results were different,below is my code:
hisat2 \\ -x \$INDEX \\ -1 ${cleanqs[0]} \\ -2 ${cleanqs[1]} \\ --met-stderr \\ --new-summary \\ --dta \\ --summary-file ${sample}.hisat2.summary.log \\ --threads ${task.cpus} \\ --no-mixed \\ --no-discordant \\ | samtools view --threads ${task.cpus} -bS | samtools sort --threads ${task.cpus} -o ${sample}.sort.bam
then,I use samtools stats to calculate the mapping result information for two bam files ,below is my bam statistical result:
samtools stats
I'm curious about what causes the results of the two mapping to be different,could it be caused by seed? looking forward to your response,thanks!
Hi,dear developers,I often use HISTAT2 for RNAseq data analysis, but recently I used the same fastq data(RNAseq,PE50) and the same mapping command to analyze and found that the mapping results were different,below is my code:
then,I use
samtools stats
to calculate the mapping result information for two bam files ,below is my bam statistical result:I'm curious about what causes the results of the two mapping to be different,could it be caused by seed? looking forward to your response,thanks!