Closed AdamKorcz closed 3 years ago
Looks good. A couple of things:
The leak in the enhance fuzzer is in l. 123: pixTRCMapGeneral() returns a pix.
You don't need to check a pix before pixDestroy(). So in the enchance fuzzer, just do pixDestroy(&return_pix);
There are a few format issues that don't affect performance and I'll clean them up later.
Thank you for the comments. They should have been addressed now.
thank you!!
This PR adds 4 new fuzzers and a rewritten version of the enhance-fuzzer.
The reason for rewriting the enhance-fuzzer is to optimize the targets in the fuzzer. Those targets that are called elsewhere are removed and new ones have been added.
The enhance-fuzzer does leak memory. To me it looks like everything is cleaned up the way it should be, so any input in this regards is much appreciated.