Closed lodi-g closed 1 year ago
Python 3 doesn't have scapy support so there is a reason behind choosing python 2. Python 3 will be better the day that library support is fixed. Until that day Py2 is better.
I don't think relying on an old library which runs on a deprecated language is a good idea tbh.
Well sure. But you're looking at two options: scapy or impacket. Neither of which are python3. So there's not much choice.
On Nov 6, 2017 4:03 PM, "Grégoire Lodi" notifications@github.com wrote:
I don't think relying on an old library which runs on a deprecated language is a good idea tbh.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DanMcInerney/wifijammer/issues/77#issuecomment-342317836, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABuspZgOtmJQUtKyor2ojHkobXBbX9-9ks5sz5AwgaJpZM4PSdmz .
Python2. is still very well maintained by the community in my opinion.
That's where the problem lies imo. Why Python's community still supports an old, deprecated, featureless version of their 'favorite' language and then import __future__
is beyond me.
Well guess that's a personal stance :)
First of all, you did a great work.
However, is there any particular reason you would use Python 2 for this? Python 3 has been out since 2008, is widely supported and just really better than Py2 in a lot of way.
Thanks,