Python version

[lodi-g]

First of all, you did a great work.

However, is there any particular reason you would use Python 2 for this? Python 3 has been out since 2008, is widely supported and just really better than Py2 in a lot of way.

Thanks,

[MisterBianco]

Python 3 doesn't have scapy support so there is a reason behind choosing python 2. Python 3 will be better the day that library support is fixed. Until that day Py2 is better.

[lodi-g]

I don't think relying on an old library which runs on a deprecated language is a good idea tbh.

[DanMcInerney]

Well sure. But you're looking at two options: scapy or impacket. Neither of which are python3. So there's not much choice.

On Nov 6, 2017 4:03 PM, "Grégoire Lodi" notifications@github.com wrote:

I don't think relying on an old library which runs on a deprecated language is a good idea tbh.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DanMcInerney/wifijammer/issues/77#issuecomment-342317836, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABuspZgOtmJQUtKyor2ojHkobXBbX9-9ks5sz5AwgaJpZM4PSdmz .

[oldkingcone]

Python2. is still very well maintained by the community in my opinion.

[lodi-g]

That's where the problem lies imo. Why Python's community still supports an old, deprecated, featureless version of their 'favorite' language and then import __future__ is beyond me.

[MisterBianco]

Well guess that's a personal stance :)