Look into Terrapin

[Daniel-Mietchen]

as per https://www.terrapin.ai/

Terrapin will generate a summary of the study goals, conclusions reached, an overview of the methodology used, any potential methodological flaws in the study design, and any potential moral implications of the study, all explained in simple terms anyone can understand. Note that right now Terrapin is only able to access and analyze studies that are available under the PMC Open Access Subset. While this subset contains millions of studies, there is a chance that a particular study entered here might not be able to be successfully analyzed.

[Daniel-Mietchen]

See via https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-dance-of-the-naked-emperors/comment/11548631 .

[Daniel-Mietchen]

Wikidata query to select example papers to test this with: https://w.wiki/6D4e .

[Daniel-Mietchen]

While they say PubMed URLs are requested, PMC URLs also work sometimes (not sure why not always, given that they use PMC to get at the full text).

Sample URLs that worked for me:

• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22207810/
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234435/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26733319/

Sample URLs that got stuck:

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966913/
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248632
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33375455/