Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 7:21
If it's not a big deal, we should separate the config.file from the main code.
That would also make it easier for the Online Configurator. And much easier for
noobs! ;)
Original comment by kinderkram@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:40
Agreed, good point !
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:41
Absolutly agreed, I'm waiting on Hein's reply, as I have made a list of all
defines that should be in the online config, and could be placed in the
arduser.h or other single .h
Dani
Original comment by Gdani.s...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:56
Hein,
Would you allow me to take your latest (r255) and move all user settings into
ArduUser.h ?
Should we give the file a more obvious name like for instance config.h ?
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 22 Jan 2011 at 12:27
I just committed these proposed changes in r256, but I accidentally did so in
Hein's branch. I'm so sorry, Hein, please forgive me - it won't happen again !
Can someone tell me how I can get the files I have here locally into my own
branch (Kim) without f*ck!ng up someone else's work ?
Thanks !
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 22 Jan 2011 at 11:12
Could you guys please take a look at r256 and comment ? Thanks !
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 3:52
Hi Kidogofoto,
I moved your changes to your folder "Kim". Please update the ArduPiratesNG
under the Trunk directly. This will be the version that all of the developers
combine their work. Thanx for changes. Please update it under trunk....
Greetings,
Hein
Original comment by lohnieh@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 6:24
I have tested your config file. Everything works. There are a few changes
though that I can make on the descriptions that are not clear for you.
If you are OK with them, I think it is time to upload to the trunk. It will
make life muche easier for everybody. Also we should arrange to get it in the
global configurator as Kinderkram suggested. I think it is very much complete
at the moment.
Emile
Original comment by emile.ca...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 11:35
Go ahead Emile, and thanks for your help ! ;)
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2011 at 7:13
It is now in the trunk; I suggest we test and then close this issue.
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2011 at 10:03
Seems to go well. I'm closing this one.
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2011 at 8:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kidogof...@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 7:20