DanielSank / theory

Physics, math and other theory
22 stars 8 forks source link

Confusing definitions of omega in rotating coupling section #52

Closed DanielSank closed 5 years ago

DanielSank commented 5 years ago

From @amopremcak:

The table in section 5.3 uses \omega_1 and \omega2 to denote the qubit frequencies, but a few sentences below the symbols \omega{r1} and \omega{r_2} to denote the same thing.

DanielSank commented 5 years ago

In principle, the frame rotation frequencies do not have to be equal to the qubits' resonance frequencies. So \omega1 and \omega{r1} are not necessarily the same thing. Could you recommend a way to clarify this point? @amopremcak

amopremcak commented 5 years ago

I see. I thought for some reason you were creating another variable for the qubit frequency. What you have now is totally fine, and \omega{r1} and \omega{r2} make sense with respect to the notation used at the start of section 5.