Closed shps951023 closed 3 years ago
Happy to discuss it if you like, but: I have no idea what this means
I see Dapper and protobuf-net as completely separate tools, with no particular overlap. There has never been any specific Dapper-plus-protobuf-net plan, so there is nothing to stop. There are plans for both of them in isolation to make better use of generators, but both of those plans need my time, which is the limiting factor.
If you feel there's a scenario that needs attention in a composite way, I'm happy to discuss it. But I don't have a list of such crossover scenarios currently.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 08:55 Wei, @.***> wrote:
@mgravell https://github.com/mgravell
Hi, I like DapperAOT using Roslyn generator idea to remove runtime emit/reflection dependencies, it's awesome! But it looks like dapper with protobuf-net plan will be stopped?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DapperLib/DapperAOT/issues/6, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEHMB5B6YJQXPKERCQ3QTTYPK63ANCNFSM5ATE4TIQ .
@mgravell
Sorry, I know my knowledge is wrong, so I close this question.
I like DapperAOT idea and I'm reading it now.
I close this issue