Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I think not having a Cell object for a cell with a null value could be
considered a useful memory optimization.
Would it be acceptable to you to have cells.colName.value return null instead
of an error, rather than wasting the space by allocating Cell objects for all
the blank cells?
Original comment by tfmorris
on 8 Oct 2011 at 9:33
Yeah that sounds fine. The main point is that cells.colName.value returns null
instead of an error; I'm not worried about how that is accomplished.
Original comment by jcreena...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2011 at 12:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jcreena...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 4:10Attachments: