peer to peer code review

[Zuhaib042]

Good job on testing your functions but there are some things that need to be addressed.

• Kindly remove the commented-out code because it makes the code look unclean.
• Kindly remove the extra file that has not been used in the mock folder.

[MuhmmdUsama]

Hi @Daron976

Good job so far! You still need to work on some issues, but you are almost there!

Highlights

• Good Readme :heavy_check_mark:
• No linter error :heavy_check_mark:
• All testing cases are passed :heavy_check_mark:

Required Changes ♻️

• [ ] Kindly clear all unused commented code lines
• [ ] There are Two babel configurations files
• [ ] You were wondering why when you use this line of code const {list} = require('../modules/functionality') you got errors Cannot read properties of null because you create another Dummy file in the __test__ file with a different function structure that has a parameters not exist in the original file.
• [ ] Clear unsued functionality.js files.

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you take them into account as they can make your code better.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏