Closed Fedhman closed 4 years ago
I agree, and the same is true for superscripts.
I thought it would be reasonable to implement a mini-markup language such as follows:
R1 for R1 or I^2 for I2 and braces for longer stuff such as h{fe} for hfe.
What do you think about it?
As LaTex programming languages. Yeah it would be perfect
Exactly. I love LaTeX!
R1 for R1 or I^2 for I2 and braces for longer stuff such as h{fe} for hfe.
After much thought, I decided against it. This would require to implement a sort of a mini-language and I don't really want to do that. Instead, I think a good solution may be to use a very simple convention:
^ -> goes towards the exponent
_ -> goes towards the index
The meaning of those rules is the following one:
x^2
will be interpreted as "x2"
this is a ^test_ where the _rest^ is not important
will yield "this is a test where the rest is not important"
In other words, in the second example the _ cancels the effect of ^ and vice versa. Parsing this is much easier than the LaTeX-style syntax.
It has not been very easy, but at the end the implementation of superscripts and subscripts in the vector file export could be done relatively smoothly.
I finally opted for this description:
Subscripts: insert text between the underscore _ and the caret ^; for example _12^ writes 12 as a subscript. Superscripts: insert text between the caret ^ and the underscore _; for example ^56_ writes 56 as a superscript. In the two cases, the last ^ or _ are optional. To print the _ or ^ character, use a backspace, i.e. \_ to obtain _ and \^ to obtain ^. Use two backspaces to obtain a single \. Example: 3^2_+4^2_=5^2 or C_12
(resource text_hints
in the English language).
I close this issue now, as the implementation is complete.
They would be really usefull, expecially to differenciate resistors and capacitors (and so on).