Open pietrushnic opened 5 months ago
This is problematic for many community members focused on privacy since subscriptions are typically renewable and require keeping records of payment-related data, which, in the long run, could be of various for specific players.
->This is problematic for many community members focused on privacy since subscriptions are typically renewable and require keeping records of payment-related data, which, in the long run, could be of problematic for specific players.
various -> "problematic" ?
Opening up a PR is a good idea.
Yes Entry Package has lower negative connotation than Subscription from my consumer viewpoint.
As noted internally there is also a need for differentiation in name when business customers buy in bulk. I tried to incorporate the above description in following documentation: https://github.com/Dasharo/docs/pull/820
We have many issues with the current naming scheme and the growing number of supported platforms. I want to start a discussion with the community about potential improvements in the naming scheme. I want to make it public so others in the future can refer to this discussion and understand the background and decision-making process.
What are the issues?
Naming
"Entry Subscription" suggests an ongoing, renewable service, which contradicts the product's prepaid nature. This is problematic for many community members focused on privacy since subscriptions are typically renewable and require keeping records of payment-related data, which, in the long run, could be of various for specific players. Those are not all concerns related to the subscription model, but we don't want to talk about the business model here. The name is confusing and does not reflect reality.
Proposal: We could change it to something like Dasharo Entry Package. We can also prevent changes in abbreviations and keep S as Suite/Set/Solution/System/Series, etc.
Complexity of naming
Proposal: If the following description would be something we would like to discuss more widely, I will move it to separate PR so that everyone can comment.
Introduction strategy
Changing the naming convention could pose challenges in communication with the community and customers.
Proposal: