Currently, we do not support Bash files. We need a way to parse and query bash files, but we do not currently fetch and build a Bash grammar.
What is your solution?
Add the Bash grammar to the analyzer itself, which is fetched from https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-bash. This will allow us (and customers down the line) to begin writing rules targeting Bash files.
Alternatives considered
Not supporting bash files
What the reviewer should know
I renamed the python example code string to be prefixed with PYTHON_ since I added a bash one too, and reused this in the Starlark test hence why the code relating to the Starlark test was modified.
What problem are you trying to solve?
Currently, we do not support Bash files. We need a way to parse and query bash files, but we do not currently fetch and build a Bash grammar.
What is your solution?
Add the Bash grammar to the analyzer itself, which is fetched from https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-bash. This will allow us (and customers down the line) to begin writing rules targeting Bash files.
Alternatives considered
Not supporting bash files
What the reviewer should know
I renamed the python example code string to be prefixed with
PYTHON_since I added a bash one too, and reused this in the Starlark test hence why the code relating to the Starlark test was modified.