Open NishantAgrawalTR opened 2 years ago
Hello @NishantAgrawalTR,
We haven't planned any work on this. That said, I'll look into whether we could prioritise instrumenting HttpMessageHandler abstract class instead which would solve this one as well. Scratch that, this solution would be way to noisy. We'll need to prioritize this use case specifically. And I can't commit on anything for now unfortunately.
Are you requesting automatic instrumentation for a framework or library? Please describe.
Framework or library name : StandardSocketsHttpHandler https://github.com/TalAloni/StandardSocketsHttpHandler
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. There's no auto instrumentation for StandardSocketsHttpHandler and we would like to utilize this class over the existing ones (System.Net.Http.HttpClientHandler & System.Net.Http.HttpMessageHandler). The StandardSocketsHttpHandler is a port of System.Net.Http.SocketsHttpHandler for .NET Standard/Framework.
Describe the solution you'd like Similar auto instrumentation for StandardSocketsHttpHandler similar to one in Instrument System.Net.Http.SocketsHttpHandler #668