Open gleocadie opened 4 days ago
Branch report: gleocadie/fix-linux-compilation-warning
Commit report: 6e5399c
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet
:x: 7 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 342385 Passed, 1890 Skipped, 15h 28m 44.61s Total Time
This report shows up to 5 failed tests.
TestDirectoryListingLeak
-Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.AspNetCore5IastTestsRestartedSampleIastEnabled
- Details
<details>
<summary>Expand for error</summary>
```
Unable to determine port application is listening on
```
</details>
TestDirectoryListingLeak
- Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.AspNetCore5IastTestsRestartedSampleIastEnabled
- Details
TestCookieNameRequest
- Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.AspNetCore5IastTestsSpanTelemetryIastEnabled
- Details
TestIastJsonTagSizeExceeded
- Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.AspNetCore5IastTestsSpanTelemetryIastEnabled
- Details
TestIastTelemetry
- Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.AspNetCore5IastTestsSpanTelemetryIastEnabled
- Details
Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:
Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.
Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).
gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (74ms) : 65, 83
. : milestone, 74,
master - mean (73ms) : 65, 82
. : milestone, 73,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (897ms) : 870, 924
. : milestone, 897,
master - mean (992ms) : 971, 1012
. : milestone, 992,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (109ms) : 106, 113
. : milestone, 109,
master - mean (110ms) : 106, 113
. : milestone, 110,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (634ms) : 618, 650
. : milestone, 634,
master - mean (706ms) : 681, 731
. : milestone, 706,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (93ms) : 90, 95
. : milestone, 93,
master - mean (93ms) : 90, 96
. : milestone, 93,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (590ms) : 575, 605
. : milestone, 590,
master - mean (658ms) : 634, 682
. : milestone, 658,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (191ms) : 188, 194
. : milestone, 191,
master - mean (192ms) : 187, 197
. : milestone, 192,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (1,000ms) : 971, 1030
. : milestone, 1000,
master - mean (1,090ms) : 1061, 1118
. : milestone, 1090,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (277ms) : 272, 281
. : milestone, 277,
master - mean (278ms) : 273, 283
. : milestone, 278,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (823ms) : 791, 856
. : milestone, 823,
master - mean (878ms) : 854, 901
. : milestone, 878,
gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (5751) - mean (266ms) : 261, 270
. : milestone, 266,
master - mean (266ms) : 262, 270
. : milestone, 266,
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (5751) - mean (811ms) : 784, 837
. : milestone, 811,
master - mean (862ms) : 838, 886
. : milestone, 862,
Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:
Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!
gantt
title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (5751) (11.250M) : 0, 11250000
master (11.521M) : 0, 11521470
benchmarks/2.9.0 (12.028M) : 0, 12027804
section Automatic
This PR (5751) (7.812M) : 0, 7812212
master (7.634M) : 0, 7633719
benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.471M) : 0, 8471115
section Trace stats
master (8.171M) : 0, 8170678
section Manual
This PR (5751) (9.863M) : 0, 9862764
master (10.009M) : 0, 10008600
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (5751) (7.506M) : 0, 7505970
master (7.285M) : 0, 7285173
section Version Conflict
master (6.562M) : 0, 6561604
gantt
title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (5751) (9.539M) : 0, 9539257
master (9.421M) : 0, 9421362
benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.556M) : 0, 9555936
section Automatic
This PR (5751) (6.654M) : 0, 6653530
master (6.538M) : 0, 6538499
section Trace stats
master (6.846M) : 0, 6845967
section Manual
This PR (5751) (8.358M) : 0, 8357605
master (8.396M) : 0, 8396114
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (5751) (6.188M) : 0, 6188485
master (6.262M) : 0, 6262289
section Version Conflict
master (5.705M) : 0, 5705337
gantt
title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests)
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Baseline
This PR (5751) (10.439M) : 0, 10439300
master (9.862M) : 0, 9861889
benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.885M) : 0, 9885158
section Automatic
This PR (5751) (7.224M) : 0, 7224322
master (7.083M) : 0, 7083189
benchmarks/2.9.0 (6.977M) : 0, 6977395
section Trace stats
master (7.352M) : 0, 7351962
section Manual
This PR (5751) (9.136M) : 0, 9136258
master (8.799M) : 0, 8799384
section Manual + Automatic
This PR (5751) (6.935M) : 0, 6934878
master (6.892M) : 0, 6892212
section Version Conflict
master (6.119M) : 0, 6118897
Benchmarks for #5751 compared to master:
The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:
Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.
Summary of changes
Reason for change
Implementation details
Test coverage
Other details