perf(profiling): upgrade libdatadog to v10

[morrisonlevi]

PROF-9125

Description

This shrinks our memory footprint. It also reduces our CPU (but just a smidge, not a big change).

Reviewer checklist

• [ ] Test coverage seems ok.
• [ ] Appropriate labels assigned.

[pr-commenter[bot]]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-06-07 16:00:09

Comparing candidate commit 3e345e7fe72630d7aad5894014b07393a84513d0 in PR branch levi/libdatadog-v10 with baseline commit f8c9e42da6ba412b175a407ddd147e61b6b2c2aa in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 79.32%. Comparing base (f8c9e42) to head (3e345e7).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2697 +/- ## ============================================ + Coverage 77.78% 79.32% +1.54% Complexity 2223 2223 ============================================ Files 227 201 -26 Lines 26531 22514 -4017 Branches 988 0 -988 ============================================ - Hits 20637 17860 -2777 + Misses 5368 4654 -714 + Partials 526 0 -526 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [appsec-extension](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) | `?` | | | [tracer-extension](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) | `78.63% <ø> (ø)` | | | [tracer-php](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) | `80.33% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 26 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog). Last update [f8c9e42...3e345e7](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DataDog/dd-trace-php/pull/2697?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=DataDog).