Closed mbjones closed 2 years ago
Updated with recent changes from develop to bring this in line.
Given that we also have netCDF-4
and similar types that use the application/netcdf
mime type, I think we should stick with netCDF-CF
for the name of this more specialized format.
Followed the NetCDF proposal in #17. My only question is whether we should shift the formatId for version 1.8 and above (where we go with a generic version) from
netCDF-CF
as proposed to the more recognizable mime typeapplication/netcdf
? Thoughts?