Closed ThomasThelen closed 2 years ago
And EML 2.0.0 which is almost identical. It would be great to support all of the released versions of EML (2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.2.0).
I'm also noticing that a number of LTER datasets are failing since they're using 2.1.0. +1 for supporting all of the EML versions listed above so that we're not missing out on these datasets.
Support for EML 2.x.x was merged in #69
While testing Slinky on the PISCO datasets I saw a large number of failures because the associated metadata documents are using the
eml://ecoinformatics.org/eml-2.0.1
format, which we don't support.It might be a good idea to add a new EML processor class to support this version so that we get these datasets in the graph.