Closed smotornyuk closed 8 years ago
A couple of minor points.
I think it would be slightly better style if it doesn't set c.userat line 250 and only sets it after setting c.userobj as in your 2nd commit.
c.user
c.userobj
It would also be more intuitive to refer to the value pulled from REMOTE_USER as name_id instead of user.
REMOTE_USER
name_id
user
A couple of minor points.
I think it would be slightly better style if it doesn't set
c.userat line 250 and only sets it after settingc.userobjas in your 2nd commit.It would also be more intuitive to refer to the value pulled from
REMOTE_USERasname_idinstead ofuser.