Closed Banana1530 closed 5 years ago
This can now be rebased (not merged) against the current master.
Merging #47 into master will decrease coverage by
6.61%
. The diff coverage is64.97%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #47 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.17% 83.56% -6.62%
==========================================
Files 32 34 +2
Lines 2372 3042 +670
==========================================
+ Hits 2139 2542 +403
- Misses 233 500 +267
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/moma_base.h | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/moma_solver.h | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
R/moma_expose.R | 91.13% <ø> (-0.53%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/moma.h | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/moma_solver_BICsearch.cpp | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/moma_solver.cpp | 94.89% <100%> (+0.15%) |
:arrow_up: |
R/moma_sfpca.R | 63.93% <35.79%> (-26.71%) |
:arrow_down: |
R/moma_sfcca.R | 75.53% <75.53%> (ø) |
|
R/moma_sflda.R | 76.11% <76.11%> (ø) |
|
R/moma_arguments.R | 88.97% <82.05%> (-1.77%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 29 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 00839b5...50199f8. Read the comment docs.
This might be useful: https://www.rstudio.com/resources/webinars/testing-shiny-applications-with-shinytest/
I read about shinytest
when I was browsing through your Rclustviz
repo. It's a bit difficult to compare the plots due to platform reasons, but we can test the sliders work as expected.
c30d3ae passed on Mac but failed on Linux due to "PhantomJS not found".
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1zMhMaKsgrTYObsmQ6D8u3CGvLxN7I3ZQ?usp=sharing
Here are screen shots of the shiny interface.
3ffe8af currently fails on Mac but passes on Linux. Will look into it soon.