Closed jspeis closed 5 years ago
just to note: counties should also use the ACS data as well (as is the case on current data usa)
@jspeis so... another way to look at it would be: Nation and States be the only levels using PUMS? Is that correct?
Plus PUMA, so only Nation/State/PUMA would use PUMS
@jspeis this has been addressed on xenium
. The change effected not only those 2 tree maps, but also the "top/bottom" bar charts underneath each, as well as the text accompanying each viz.
I took a look at the new york page and it seems like the data might be coming from the wrong cube for the 'Highest Paid' section for occupations? If it's not using gender I think that viz should be using the acs_ygo_occupation_for_median_earnings_1
cube? cc @hwchen
/profile/geo/new-york-ny#top_occ_med_earnings
@jspeis good catch, I've updated xenium
. Is it correct that "Median Earnings by Occupation" is the only one with a rollup table? I'm using the "by Gender" tables for the number of employees, RCA, and all of the Industry charts.
Expected Behavior
Vizzes related to industry/occupation counts for MSA/places should use ACS instead of PUMS because the PUMS data won't actually cover the same geography. (Nation/State/PUMA levels however can use PUMS)
https://datausa.io/profile/geo/new-york-ny/#tmap_occ_num_emp https://datausa.io/profile/geo/new-york-ny/#tmap_ind_num_emp
Current Behavior
The industry and occupation data appears to come from PUMS instead of ACS
Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
/profile/geo/new-york-northern-new-jersey-long-island-ny-nj-pa-metro-area/
/profile/geo/new-york-ny