Datafable / diveboard-data-publication

Data publication and paper for Diveboard
http://www.gbif.org/dataset/66f6192f-6cc0-45fd-a2d1-e76f5ae3eab2
1 stars 0 forks source link

How to map location information? #5

Closed peterdesmet closed 11 years ago

peterdesmet commented 11 years ago

Next to the coordinates, 4 values are recorded for Dive site:

1. Country: Spain                          dwc:country
2. Location: Estartit & Medes Islands      dwc:locality?
3. Spot Name: Cavell Bernat                dwc:locality
4. Sea / Lake Name: Mediterranean Sea      dwc:waterBody

There are also 2 IDs, which I guess refer to 2) Location and 3) Spot name

2. <Region:0x00000006498760>      dwc:higherGeographyID?
3. <Location:0x000000068d9c98>    dwc:locationID

Country and Sea / Lake Name are easy to map and dwc:locality should contain the most specific description, so this term should at least contain Spot Name. The question is how to map Location?

  1. As part of the locality, separated by comma: Cavell Bernat, Estartit & Medes Islands. In this case, we should not map the related <region:id>.
  2. In one of the atomic fields stateProvince, island, islandGroup, etc. based on the content. This is difficult to do.
  3. As part of higherGeography, together with Country and maybe Sea / Lake Name: Spain; Estartit & Medes Islands. That way we could map <region:id>.

My preferred option is option 1, as it is the most readable in my opinion, but I could be convinced of option 3. cc @DimEvil

DimEvil commented 11 years ago

Spot name is "dwc: locality" Country is "dwc: country" Sea/ lake name is dwc: waterbody

Location: not defined enough, can be dwc: island group, but also can be something totally different. (I would skip this term)

peterdesmet commented 11 years ago

I think we need to have some more actual data to review if we drop or include this.

DimEvil commented 11 years ago

I m not sure.... I think we have enough with locality; country & waterbody & lat/long These field perfectly indicate the spot..., not?

peterdesmet commented 11 years ago

Decided on:

We won't use: