Closed stetou closed 4 years ago
Thanks for reporting this. dbt has introduced a breaking change in version 0.15. The code should work fine with version 0.14. We're aware of the problem and hope to have a fix in place for 0.15 next week. In the meantime try version 0.14 and let us know if the problem persists. Regards, Neil
Thanks for reporting this. dbt has introduced a breaking change in version 0.15. The code should work fine with version 0.14. We're aware of the problem and hope to have a fix in place for 0.15 next week. In the meantime try version 0.14 and let us know if the problem persists. Regards, Neil
This is correct. We'll have an update for 0.15 soon. For now I recommend running the worked example in a python virtual environment using the provided requirements.txt
to prevent disruption to other projects. Thanks for the report!
@stetou
Just tried running it with v0.15 of dbt to check our suspicions and it seems to be running normally (see below)
I ran the load of the links using the command dbt run --models @tag:link
which also runs all models up the dependency chain:
The error you are getting actually seems to imply you may have run the link load or staging load previously using MD5 instead, (as it is saying the value is too long) is this the case?
If so, try running dbt run --full-refresh --models @tag:link
to run the load again and force dbt to re-create the tables. If for some reason this doesn't work, you can safely drop the DEMO_x
schemas and use the following commands in turn:
dbt run --models @tag:hub
dbt run --models tag:link
.This will create the raw staging, hashed staging, hub and link layers again and get you back to where you left off.
Hope this helps!
this is what I have in dbt_project vars: date: TO_DATE('1992-01-08') hash: SHA # or MD5
I tried to load the links only once, after the hubs
Le jeu. 28 nov. 2019 à 17:42, Alex Higgs notifications@github.com a écrit :
@stetou https://github.com/stetou Just tried running it with v0.15 of dbt to check our suspicions and it seems to be running normally: [image: Screenshot from 2019-11-28 22-40-19] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25080503/69834079-18ade080-1230-11ea-884f-bd97f7ec402d.png
The error you are getting actually seems to imply you may have run the link load previously using MD5 instead, (as it is saying the value is too long) is this the case?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Datavault-UK/dbtvault/issues/1?email_source=notifications&email_token=AANSLYBAFLP5TKVYSE5TPNDQWBCLZA5CNFSM4JSY67Z2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEFNQR3Y#issuecomment-559614191, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANSLYBXDJ625MZ562EFHVDQWBCLZANCNFSM4JSY67ZQ .
@stetou
Please take a look at my edited response. I had a few additional thoughts after posting :)
deleted the demo_xxxx schemas and start from scratch, got the same error for the links. I removed dbt .15 and tried to install v0.14, v0.14.3,v.14.4 all with an error related to psycopg2 saying that pg_config is not found. I opened an issue for this, before installing postgres-server on my windows machine cause I don't need it. I'll be back as soon as I have a working installation of dbt v0.14
deleted the demo_xxxx schemas and start from scratch, got the same error for the links. I removed dbt .15 and tried to install v0.14, v0.14.3,v.14.4 all with an error related to psycopg2 saying that pg_config is not found. I opened an issue for this, before installing postgres-server on my windows machine cause I don't need it. I'll be back as soon as I have a working installation of dbt v0.14
Thank you for giving it a try.
I've just managed to re-produce the issue on dbt v0.15 AND v0.14, it's not related to the dbt version.
It only happens when SHA hashing is selected. It is something that we need to fix our end. Thank you again for the report, we'll bring out a fix asap. For now please use MD5 hashing.
@stetou
Found the issue. We forgot to update the link models in the worked example to work with v0.4 of dbtvault. The manual mappings are forcing the columns to use Binary(16) instead of (32), so it will always break when using SHA. Oops! We will release an update to the worked example shortly.
This should now be fixed in the latest release of the snowflakeDemo. Please download the new version and let us know how it goes. https://github.com/Datavault-UK/snowflakeDemo/releases/tag/v2.1 We recommend that you continue to use dbt v0.14.x as dbtvault is not yet tested and updated for v0.15.
deleted the demo_xxxx schemas and start from scratch, got the same error for the links. I removed dbt .15 and tried to install v0.14, v0.14.3,v.14.4 all with an error related to psycopg2 saying that pg_config is not found. I opened an issue for this, before installing postgres-server on my windows machine cause I don't need it. I'll be back as soon as I have a working installation of dbt v0.14
Regarding your psycopg2 issue, take a look at installation notes on the dbt 0.15 release notes. It could be related: https://discourse.getdbt.com/t/release-dbt-v0-15-0/716
thanks for this fix. I tried many things suggested on forum/release note without success. I'll wait for fishtown-analytics to answer.
Thanks for letting us know about the issue. Happy Datavaulting! :)
Describe the bug
from the worked example I get errors when creating the Links and the sats. The hubs are fine.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Screenshots If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
I'm using dbt 0.15 and revision: dbtVault v0.4 I choose sha as hash, maybe it is related? i guess not since the hubs are ok...