Open DianaNites opened 2 months ago
I'm not sure how I feel about this approach, but you make a good case for it. :) That said, you also show how it's possible to accomplish the desired result today with only a few extra characters and so I am less inclined to add explicit support.
I will leave this issue open as a possible enhancement, but anyone reading this should please treat the "mixed" approach above as the current recommendation.
HTML comments as used to configure markdownlint within a file often have the unfortunate side-effect of appearing in the final HTML source, even though unrendered.
It would be nice-to-have(TM) for the various markdownlint configuration comments to also recognize the conventional "non-HTML" comment syntax, as commonly used and supported by default in MD053.
This would purely be a "Nice To Have(TM)" convenience feature, as it is currently possible to do this by inserting a HTML comment inside the non-HTML comment, which also does not appear in the final HTML source of most renderers, per BabelMark
Another possible use-case besides convenience for this feature could be a new lint against HTML comments entirely, to make sure undesired comments don't end up user-visible without giving up on the ability to configure markdownlint inline.
It is perfectly understandable if this is not deemed worth it.