Closed DavidBM closed 3 years ago
LGTM, BTW I think we can have RsmqResult
which will make things simpler
I just checked nodejs rsmq seems they are using {rsmqns}rt
instead of {rsmqns}:rt
, shall we follow their decision to keep the compatibility?
https://github.com/smrchy/rsmq/blob/f41b7e4eceaec51ea91933f30c54db44e94c07af/index.js#L373
Good call. That makes sense, but the issue that I see is that they document it like: {rsmq.ns}:rt:{qname}
so I will ask them to choose to fix the documentation or the code.
I have added the RsmqResult type @GopherJ :)
Reported to js rsmq library on https://github.com/smrchy/rsmq/issues/128
@GopherJ They didn't respond yet to https://github.com/smrchy/rsmq/issues/128 so I will merge this one. Feel free to change the code in your local copy. Once they respond I will make any required change.
@rhuffus @voro2038 @aegis22 Would any of you take a look to the code changes?