Closed emiliasiukola closed 2 weeks ago
Hi @emiliasiukola , the input for the pool
argument is a vector with length of the genes, i.e. nrow(spe). It should be something like c("negprob1","negprob1","negprob1","negprob2","negprob2","negprob2"..., "negprobx"), so it tells the function with negative probes is governing which genes.
I wonder if the current prepareSpatialDecon
function can deal with more than one "NegProbe-WTX". For me, the spe
output form readGeoMx
with rmNegProbe
set to FALSE contains 139 negative probe values with the prefix, NegProbe-WTX_
. I'm ignoring normalization for the sake of simplicity. This line in prepareSpatialDecon
will return true (shows error) because there is no exact match:
!all("NegProbe-WTX" %in% rownames(spe))
[1] TRUE
table(grepl("NegProbe-WTX", rownames(spe)))
FALSE TRUE
18676 139
prepareDecon
looks similar to derive_GeoMx_background
provided by SpatialDecon
. I ran the following command instead:
bg <- derive_GeoMx_background(norm = assay(spe, "logcounts"),
probepool = rep(1, nrow(assay(spe, "logcounts"))),
negnames = paste0("NegProbe-WTX_", c(1:139)))
Here, more than one name for negative probes can be set, which I found here. Then I used bg
with spatialdecon
.
Hi @kimsjune , yes you're correct, both functions serve the similar purpose. Perhaps I should update it in the next version for automatically do this if multi-probs are detected...
When using the code: spd <- prepareSpatialDecon(spe_tmm)
we are getting error message: "NegProbe-WTXmust be included in the dataset. Perhaps specify rmNegProbe=TRUE when using readGeoMx" when using prepareSpatialDecon. We are using WTA so there are several negative probes, however we do not understand what the pool= variable in the command should look like. We have already specified rmNegProbe=TRUE when using readGeoMx.
Regards, Emilia