Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Would you check with the issue-164.patch that I attached on issue 164? Thanks!
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2012 at 11:24
I cannot apply the r1712 patch, since r1712 doesn't even boot up.
The code is too complicated for me to read or understand to apply relevant
parts manually to r1693. Sorry.
What does it do, anyway?
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2012 at 6:18
[deleted comment]
I found the problem and fixed it at r1722. HOWEVER, my simple fix might have
broken something else. Seems OK to me, so far.
FRSKY and DSM2=SERIAL are not mutually exclusive. People can for example have
exchangeable modules (DSM2 and FrSky) or in my case, an automatically switched
TX Caddy board, to auto-select which transmitter module is to be used,
according to what model (protocol) is loaded.
The if defines had recently been re-written as if these two options were
exclusive. That is, only one system could be present or initialised at any one
time.
Since I have both FRSKY and DSM2=SERIAL enabled, it meant that NEITHER got
initialised. Please see the r1722 diff:
http://code.google.com/p/open9x/source/diff?spec=svn1722&r=1722&format=side&path
=/trunk/src/open9x.cpp.
This is only fixing main reset initialisation. So I'm not entirely sure what
happens when protocols are selected from menus. It seems OK when I change to
PPM and then back to DSM2, so far. But I am wondering if the Fr-Sky serial port
is being re-configured correctly for non DSM2 mode models??? (9600 baud, RX and
TX enabled.) This always used to be handled correctly. Hopefully, none of that
code was actually changed???
Bryan.
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 5:36
I just tested DSM2=serial on stock the other day (where it wasn't supposed to
be officially implemented. It's working fine, except for the one problem you
mention, i.e. if you switch protocol from PPM to DSM the serial port starts
putting out DSM but at the FrSky baudrate.
So we just need to reconfigure the serial port correctly on PPM->DSM protocol
change (DSM->PPM is OK).
Original comment by bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 6:49
Then I suppose the call to DSM2_Init() was deleted at some point.
Again, this *was* all working perfectly, before. So this is all regression.
I'm not sure by whom. The fix I just committed seems to fix it for me, in
all cases I can think of testing. But I'm sure there should be a DSM2_Init
and/or a DSM2_Done() call somewhere in setupPulses()????
If whomever made the regression is reading, then perhaps they can fix it
quicker/better than I?
Bryan.
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 7:52
Probably the equivalent FrSky_Init in setupPulses, too ... if there is such
a thing.
Bryan.
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 7:53
r1712 introduces a regression, yes :) But now I see where I have to search, so
it's good!
I will try to fix the 2 bugs described here today and will ask for some more
testing, thanks!
DSM2_Init() should be called inside resetProto(). Wait ... I have to re-read
that code. It's buggy, it should be called in pulses_avr through setupPulses.
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 8:14
Sounds like you are on the right track Bertrand. Thanks!
Bryan.
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 8:20
I still don't get it. When DSM2_SERIAL and FRSKY are enabled in the same time,
the DSM2_INIT() should be called when the model is loaded (through resetProto())
Or perhaps you do the same test than Andre? (instead of loading a DSM2 model,
he loads a PPM model and changes the protocol to DSM2, in this case, the init
of DSM2 is not done, and that's the only bug I see now).
So my question is: if you load a DSM2 model, is the DSM2 initialization done
properly?
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 9:53
@Andre: would you check on stock (both serial and PPM mode), the last issue
should be solved!
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 10:36
[deleted comment]
I just updated to r1726 and ran the following tests ...
1. Configure a PPM model. Switch off. Switch back on. Check output. All OK.
2. Change model to DSM2 (serial) Check output. All OK.
3. Switch off. Switch back on. Test output. All OK.
4. Change model to PPM. Check output. All OK.
5. Switch off. Switch back on. Check output. All OK.
- - -
There is something different about my set-up that might explain test
differences. Because I have the 9X plugged into the AVR ISP mkII programmer,
that programmer always does a reset after it detects the 9X being powered up.
(So I always see the "!" warning in top right corner.) That additional reset
may sometimes mask things from me that others see, who don't have the reset
taking place. *shrug*
Original comment by gru...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 10:16
Mmh, disconnect the programmer then?
r1726 is ok for this for me too, I just have one other problem, a "noise" in
the speaker (AUDIO mod) when compiled with DSM2=SERIAL, and powering the radio
up with a DSM model selected and an alarm happens Quite a lot of conditions
indeed...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMqXqF_4Kfg
Original comment by bernet.a...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 10:24
DSM2_Init / FRSKY_Init are called within the interrupt, would it be a problem?
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 10 Dec 2012 at 10:36
Original comment by bson...@gmail.com
on 17 Jan 2013 at 11:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gru...@gmail.com
on 29 Nov 2012 at 10:58