We want to look at groups which could exhibit survivor bias.
Open:
Which groups demonstrate a deviation from average in their answers? Can this be backed up by the descriptive answers as well as numerical choices?
Closed_1:
If we isolate senior academics, what do they choose? How do these differ from junior academics? To which categories do they give the most money?
Closed_2:
If we isolate those participants who are very successful in grant applications (grant success: Yes, more than 30% of proposals), perhaps also (grant success: Yes, 20-30% of proposals), what do they choose? To which categories do they give the most money?
This figure gives some insight in the relative distribution of the categories per career stage. I don't dare to interpret too much from this yet, but there are some interesting findings.
We want to look at groups which could exhibit survivor bias.
Which groups demonstrate a deviation from average in their answers? Can this be backed up by the descriptive answers as well as numerical choices?
If we isolate senior academics, what do they choose? How do these differ from junior academics? To which categories do they give the most money?
If we isolate those participants who are very successful in grant applications (grant success: Yes, more than 30% of proposals), perhaps also (grant success: Yes, 20-30% of proposals), what do they choose? To which categories do they give the most money?