Debian / debiman

debiman generates a static manpage HTML repository out of a Debian archive
Apache License 2.0
185 stars 46 forks source link

konqueror manpage not correctly redirecting / cross-referencing #147

Open riveravaldez opened 1 year ago

riveravaldez commented 1 year ago

Hi, not sure if this is an issue or if this is the proper place to mention it (sorry in advance, just in case).

In this Debian-specific information section:

https://wiki.debian.org/Konqueror#Debian-specific_information

, there's a Manpages link: https://manpages.debian.org/man/konqueror

Clicking it goes to: https://dyn.manpages.debian.org/man/konqueror?

Which says:

Manpage not found Sorry, the manpage “konqueror” was not found! Did you spell it correctly?

Nevertheless, there's a Konqueror Debian's manpage at:

https://manpages.debian.org/buster/konqueror/konqueror.1.en.html

Is this a bug?, maybe just a broken link?

Just informing... Hope this helps.

Thanks a lot and kind regards!

stapelberg commented 1 year ago

The wiki page contains [[DebianMan:konqueror|Manpages]], and that syntax seems to produce invalid links: it should be https://manpages.debian.org/konqueror, not https://manpages.debian.org/man/konqueror (there should be no man/ in the path).

Can you report that issue with the wiki folks please? See https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact

That said, something is weird about the konqueror manpage/package, even when opening it via https://manpages.debian.org/buster/konqueror/konqueror.1.en.html — as soon as you click on the “testing” version, it no longer cross-references back to other versions.

Not sure when I’ll have time to look into this more deeply.

riveravaldez commented 1 year ago

Can you report that issue with the wiki folks please? See https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact

Done.

That said, something is weird about the konqueror manpage/package, even when opening it via https://manpages.debian.org/buster/konqueror/konqueror.1.en.html — as soon as you click on the “testing” version, it no longer cross-references back to other versions.

Indeed. I also noticed it.

Not sure when I’ll have time to look into this more deeply.

I guess any time will be good enough. :)

Thanks for the reply. Best regards!