This PR offers suggested feedback to #24. Specifically, some issues around types were found when linking this package to a project using it. There are also some new package configurations that are updated.
WHERE SHOULD THE REVIEWER START?
package.json
HOW CAN THIS BE MANUALLY TESTED?
Run the test suite.
Build the package.
Link the package locally to a project being built in TypeScript and ensure the types match up as expected.
ANY NEW DEPENDENCIES ADDED?
Several added, updated, and moved around. Review the package.json
CHECKLIST
Be sure all items are ✅ before submitting a PR for review.
[ ] Verify the linter and tests pass: npm run review
[ ] Verify this branch is rebased with the latest master
OVERVIEW
Give a brief description of what this PR does.
This PR offers suggested feedback to #24. Specifically, some issues around types were found when linking this package to a project using it. There are also some new package configurations that are updated.
WHERE SHOULD THE REVIEWER START?
package.json
HOW CAN THIS BE MANUALLY TESTED?
Run the test suite. Build the package. Link the package locally to a project being built in TypeScript and ensure the types match up as expected.
ANY NEW DEPENDENCIES ADDED?
Several added, updated, and moved around. Review the package.json
CHECKLIST
Be sure all items are ✅ before submitting a PR for review.
npm run reviewGIF
Share a fun GIF to say thanks to your reviewer: https://giphy.com