Closed DoomDragoon closed 9 months ago
Talking to the professor i have adjusted my claim: ITFlow provides secure access to roles in the environment.
Draft 1 RBAC within ITFlow:
Good call on referencing other claims, and I like the sub-claims. Do you think there could be an undermining claim added anywhere?
That's what i was thinking about adding next, i just needed some time to think of more security related issues with the role based access controls.
RBAC Assurance claim draft 2:
Added more information as well as took teammates comments into consideration.
This might just be my OCD but making the evidence bubbles larger might help with readability. Dont forget to ad E1, E2 etc to your evidence.
I believe the undermine items need to begin with an "unless..." statement.
RBAC Assurance Case Final Draft:
Potential claim for Role Based Access control: Role Based Access control provides sufficient access to user accounts