Closed liyishuai closed 5 years ago
I would actually be tempted to suggest that what we have (or plan to have) is worthy of a 1.0.0 release. Unless we adopt Haskell versioning scheme :-)
Indeed, the "First release" project seems much more than a v0.1.0 looks like.
If I read this right we should actually have been doing 0.* releases since the start. So I propose to make 0.1.0 release right after #114 since there are already projects depending on this library in the current state, and move the remaining milestones to 1.0.0.
It looks like we're in good shape for 1.0.0 now already.
I've drafted coq/opam-coq-archive#608, which depends on a release in this repo.
Let's make a release this afternoon/evening.
Sounds great!
Despite the rapid development, some release 0.1.0 would be convenient for heavy users e.g. DeepWeb. https://semver.org/#how-should-i-deal-with-revisions-in-the-0yz-initial-development-phase