Closed johnmaguire closed 4 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 9b83347debed63114a3c97ae292868fa18b5490b |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/nebula-docs-dn/deploys/6606f9cf7d0c3d0008b1bfca |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-117--nebula-docs-dn.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Nice to see this making it into the docs. I would mention that the linux distros are moving to nftables . Even UFW is based on nftables after 21.xx https://askubuntu.com/questions/1370901/ubuntu-21-10-switched-to-nftables-so-why-is-iptables-still-available
So having both ufw and nftables config on same system does not make sense IMO. I would prioritize the nftables version over the other for the reasons above: everyone is using nftables under the hood. Thanks for improving on the config. I am quite new to nftables :) .
@ieugen Thanks for the feedback. I think we prefer to take an agnostic approach to which firewall users use. I agree it doesn't make sense to configure both ufw and nftables rules on the same system. However, if you're using a system like Ubuntu, ufw is still the preferred firewall of choice, to my underrstanding. Mostly, this comes down to which firewall your distro of choice recommends. (We're still missing firewalld instructions. :P)
I did put iptables last, so that users might notice they have ufw/nftables available, before defaulting to iptables.
@johnmaguire : I do plan to take a look at firewalld at some point in the future. It seems it has received the feature to allow forwarding - but I did not test that https://firewalld.org/2020/04/intra-zone-forwarding .
Seems like the feature got in firewalld 0.7.4 in 2020 so it should be in most stable distros by now.
Firewalld will generate nftables configuration .
Also https://www.eriksuniverse.com/using-firewalld-as-a-linux-router.html
Thanks @ieugen for the nftables instructions.