Closed veenstrajelmer closed 3 weeks ago
When using the original series, we get a (raw) springneap tide kromme like this:
When using the extended series, we get a (raw) springneap tide kromme like this:
When alternating the image, it is clearly visible that this has an impact on the raw gemiddelde getijkromme for spring/neap tide. However, it is not investigated whether this will have a significant impact on the eventual scaled krommes. For now, stick to what was done before. However, in the future it can be reconsidered to extend the components used for generating the raw spring/neap kromme.
springneap kromme is based on "zuiveren harmonischen van S2 en M2". This seems not to be the case, the code below shows the shallow water components that are only dependent on M2/S2, which is more than the list in the 1991 document. In the past, this list resulted in a kromme that was not repetitive, is this still the case?
So this would result in 6 different components. If we use all schureman components instead of the year-list,
"S6"
is also included.