Controls and Structures

[d2hydro]

• [x] Haringvliet; outlet + discrete control following lobith, see #57
• [x] IJsselmeer, outlet (peil waddenzee = ijsselmeerpeil); later resistance withmax_flow_rate and level-control water_level IJsselmeer
• [x] Markermeer, resistance without control; later add control and max_flow_rate
• [x] Nijkerkersluis, resistance, deactivat; later, add control + max_flow_rate (or change to outlet)
• [x] Reevesluis, resistance (will go to IJsselmeer
• [x] Irenesluis, outlet with flow_rate 60m3/s, level-control on ARK
• [x] Panheel:
  • [x] uncontrolled outlet (loss from shipping locks), fixed flow rate
  • [x] controlled outlet (Wessem-Nederweert to Meuse); maintaining water level on Wessem-Nederweert active during during peak-flow
  • [x] controlled pump; (Meuse to Wessem-Nederweert); maintaining water level on Wessem-Nederweert, active during net-loss

[gijsber]

Paar typos gefixed (het is Wessem-Nederweert ipv wessen) en aangegevens waar de de controlled structure geactiveerd wordt

[d2hydro]

Couldn't find a specific example-model for level-boundaries, but control Ijsselmeer, Markermeer and Veluwerandmeren via a time-table at level-boundaries seems to work

Time-table taken from DM-files:

Model is uploaded as version 2024.2.2

[DanielTollenaar]

Uitwerking Panheel:

Volgend https://www.helpdeskwater.nl/publish/pages/188982/watersystemen-midden-limburg-en-noord-brabantse-kanalen.pdf:

• Gemaal Panheel pompt max 3m3/s richting Kanaal Wessem-Nederweert en probeert 28.6 m NAP te handhaven op kanaal middels een PID
• Sluis Panheel laat max 10m3/s uit richting de Maas en probeert 28.7 m NAP te handhaven op kanaal middels een PID

Uitwerking Irenesluis

Volgend https://www.helpdeskwater.nl/publish/pages/188956/watersystemen-ark-nzk.pdf: probeert -0.4m NAP te handhaven op ARK met een max_flow_rate van 60m3/s middels een PID