Discretize Maas

[DanielTollenaar]

verbeteren schematisatie

• [ ] Sluis Born (Julianakanaal)

[DanielTollenaar]

As discussed in #77, using LinearResistance are clearly not the best choice here, maybe TabulatedRatingCurves is. UserInput could be (for every structure):

• zero_discharge_level (we can take from the longview above)
• max_discharge_level (we can estimate from rws waterinfo)
• max_discharge; in case of the meuse 3500 m3/s

From that we can autocompute a rating-curve

[DanielTollenaar]

@gijsber, reading your comment: https://github.com/Deltares/Ribasim-NL/issues/77#issuecomment-2060531169. We may extend your user-input described above to 3 control points (two for low flow, one for max_discharge). Keeping it at one node we can parameterize with relatively limited user-input.

I leave it up to @visr to judge what is numerically wise, but 2 nodes (Outlet + TabulatedRatingCurve), one (Outlet) with control, doesn't sound appealing to me.

Again, from a WRM point of view Meuse flow_rate is of interest. I still think storage isn't.

[gijsber]

Tabulated rating curve probably can do the job as well where H hardly rises with rising Q untill we reach the point where the weirs are down

[gijsber]

see https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/water/waterbeheer/bescherming-tegen-het-water/waterkeringen/dammen-sluizen-en-stuwen/de-7-maasstuwen voor vragen aan RWS: Maas; Lianita Suryawinata Rijn: Daniel van Putte