I'm not sure it was wrong but it sounded like it needed another "he/she" before will
Before: Our proposal introduces cryptographically induced equality: as long as any person is able to validate his or her self-sovereign identity, will get a corresponding share of ''votes''
But I thought it would be too repetitive so I re-wrote it like this.
After: any person able to validate his or her self-sovereign identity will get a corresponding share of ''votes'' that is equal to the share of every active participant in the network.
I'm not sure it was wrong but it sounded like it needed another "he/she" before will
Before: Our proposal introduces cryptographically induced equality: as long as any person is able to validate his or her self-sovereign identity, will get a corresponding share of ''votes''
But I thought it would be too repetitive so I re-wrote it like this.
After: any person able to validate his or her self-sovereign identity will get a corresponding share of ''votes'' that is equal to the share of every active participant in the network.