I used results derived from the minikraken database, but a review suggested reanalyzing with the standard database. Personally, I prefer the minikraken database because it seems to be composed mainly of significant strains, as opposed to the standard database, which may include a wider variety of miscellaneous strains. Both seem to be based on the refseq database. According to Dr. Lu in query #207, the minikraken database was created using complete bacteria sequences. How does this differ from the standard database?
I used results derived from the minikraken database, but a review suggested reanalyzing with the standard database. Personally, I prefer the minikraken database because it seems to be composed mainly of significant strains, as opposed to the standard database, which may include a wider variety of miscellaneous strains. Both seem to be based on the refseq database. According to Dr. Lu in query #207, the minikraken database was created using complete bacteria sequences. How does this differ from the standard database?