nus-pe-bot
commented
3 years ago Team's Response
It is pretty clear that no date input means no flag.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Mark feature behavior does not match the user guide
Step to reproduce:
- Enter the command:
mark -n Candice da/Expected:
As shown in the screenshot, no date will mark the absence period to be the next 7 days
Actual:
Not marked. Error message displayed.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S1/pe-interim#4432] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.Medium]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
No date input means no date prefix attached. In this case a date input of an incorrect format was provided. It is not considered no date, but a wrong date period entered.
As mentioned here, this is a flag input, and the date is expected, however the flag input provided did not have the appropriate date attached, it is not considered
no date input.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
:question: Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Step to reproduce:
unmark -n Candice da/Expected:
When 0 date input specified, removed the absence period for the next seven days, as stated in the user guide Removed
Actual: Error message displayed does not match.