Open Deunitato opened 4 years ago
Ingredient
was used to refer to the class Ingredient when it is important for the reader to know that we were referring to the class Ingredient
.
We use 'Ingredients', 'ingredients' and 'ingredient' when we are simply talking about an ingredient or several ingredients in prose, simply to be grammatically correct and to improve readability. For these instances, the user either do not necessarily need to refer to the class Ingredient
or it was already obvious to the user that we are referring to the class Ingredient
.
Hence we used the words 'ingredient', 'ingredients' and 'Ingredients' to improve readability. In fact, these words were actually not enclosed by backticks so the user knows that we are using these words in prose and there isn't another class called Ingredients
, etc.
This is similar to how AB3 refers to AddressBook
in prose as simply address book.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: As in in code blocks, AB3 is consistent. They do not AddressBook
and addressBook
.
Especially since your's is a command, your user guide/ developer guide is inconsistent in the use of this command.
Sometimes your command is add Ingredient
sometimes it is add ingredient
This is not consistent!
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
No details provided.
Sometimes its
ingredients
sometimes itsIngedient
, sometimes itsingredient
and sometimes isIngredients
So what is it?