Closed nitriques closed 12 years ago
Why does it try to select from CACHE?
SELECT SQL_CACHE field_id FROM sym_fields_multilingual_textbox
... Bummer :(
Let's post the issues for 2.0 on the issue tracker from my fork until the thing is stable and changes are merged here.
This commit should fix it. Can you confirm it is working?
@vlad-ghita Sorry but it's even worst, worst being that the error message is bigger !
BTW, I just used your lastest version from your master branch.
MySQL Error (1054): Unknown column 'unique_handle' in 'sym_fields_multilingual_textbox' in query "ALTER TABLE sym_fields_multilingual_textbox
CHANGE formatter
text_formatter
VARCHAR(255) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NULL DEFAULT NULL, CHANGE unique_handle
text_handle
ENUM('yes', 'no') CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NULL DEFAULT 'yes', CHANGE use_def_lang_vals
def_ref_lang
ENUM('yes', 'no') CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NULL DEFAULT 'no', MODIFY text_validator
VARCHAR(255) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci DEFAULT NULL, MODIFY text_size
ENUM('single', 'small', 'medium', 'large', 'huge') CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci DEFAULT 'medium', ADD text_cdata
ENUM('yes', 'no') CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL DEFAULT 'no';"
If the issue #26 could be fixed I could wait for a more stable release of the field.
BTW, I loggued other bugs in your fork. See https://github.com/vlad-ghita/multilingual_field/issues/1
Regarding #26, I worked on a fresh install of this as well (1.4). Then upgraded to 2.0. Worked perfect.
The above error appears because there's a conflict between the number version of your extension and the actual data in the system.
In your case ... it would be great If you could revert everything to the state before trying to upgrade.
What version does the extension say you have installed? 1.4? 1.4.1? My hunch is that you have a version installed but not with the required modifications, so make them manually.
If 1.4, you must make sure column unique_handle ENUM('yes','no') DEFAULT 'yes'
exists in tbl_fields_multilingual
. If it doesn't, add it manually. Upgrade to 2.0.
If 1.4.1, you must make sure use_def_lang_vals ENUM('yes','no') DEFAULT 'yes'
exists in tbl_fields_multilingual
. If it doesn't, add it manually. Upgrade to 2.0.
This can be closed as well since #26 is solved.
Now that I can execute 1.4.1 successfully, I stay with it ! Thanks for all your help.
Finally, I have a question: If I have a mandatory field, but I used the option 'used the default text' enabled, ALL laguage must be filled. Shouldn't it be ok if the user only fills the default language ?
Finally, I have a question: If I have a mandatory field, but I used the option 'used the default text' enabled, ALL laguage must be filled. Shouldn't it be ok if the user only fills the default language ?
Not really. If this is enabled, used the default text
the default value will be returned if the value for current language is missing.
If you marked the field as required
, then the user must supply data for all languages.
Would you consider adding an option for making my scenario possible ? Like Require only default language
?
I may code it in my fork since this is something I would really be glad to have. It happens often that the translated text is entered later in the development process and this would prevent having to copy-paste texts across language.
If you think that this do not fit into your extensions, I'll leave it into mine. If you want to have this, I would be glad to send a pull request.
Thanks again.
required == checked
=> the field is required => all languages will be filled (theoretically). def_ref_lang
is irrelevant. The fields must be filled.
required != checked && def_ref_lang == checked
=> optional field and will default to def_ref_lang
.
For dev purposes, it is a problem indeed with copy+paste. Why don't you simply put a dot .
or something?
We copy/paste because the dot .
won't give a good idea to the client about the final layout.
Also, putting only a dot requires the user to click on the language tab for each field, which is a loss of productivity and usability.
As I said, if you do not want this feature, I'll keep it in my fork. I can sense that even after developement, this could still be usefull as some of my clients would like to have this in production.
I get this error
Table 'dev_vs.sym_fields_multilingual_textbox' doesn't exist in query "SELECT SQL_CACHE field_id FROM
sym_fields_multilingual_textbox
"If I manually rename the table, I get this error
MySQL Error (1050): Table 'sym_fields_multilingual_textbox' already exists in query "RENAME TABLE
sym_fields_multilingual
TOsym_fields_multilingual_textbox
;"Looks like a dead end...