Closed DevAhamed closed 5 years ago
Merging #93 into 2.x will increase coverage by
0.11%
. The diff coverage is84.61%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #93 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.04% 76.15% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 1152 1170 +18
Branches 168 172 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 876 891 +15
Misses 176 176
- Partials 100 103 +3
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...pter/src/main/java/mva2/adapter/NestedSection.java | 81.03% <83.33%> (+0.12%) |
:arrow_up: |
...ew-adapter/src/main/java/mva2/adapter/Section.java | 71.42% <85.71%> (+0.84%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4c940ec...d91a484. Read the comment docs.
Previously when the NestedSection is being shown or hidden, its child section's visibilities are untouched. But this might create issues when selection or expansion is toggled ie., incorrect selection / expansion flags are set to the child section even though the parent's is not visible in the adapter. So we set visibility to all child section which will produce the correct behavior.