Peer to Peer Code Review

[aamir-asaram]

Hey Winner, you've done a great job implementing the required features of the project! Highlights

• Clean, DRY code :+1:
• Minimal UI based on template :+1:
• No linter errors

However, there are a few small changes I'd suggest that can improve your code.

• [x] When focusing on your task input, you should set its outline to none. This will better match the given template
• [x] When clearing all checked tasks, you do not properly update the indices of the remaining tasks. This may cause issues in your project.
• [ ] The remove task icon should also be hidden again once the task becomes unfocused, consider trying a different event listener than 'click' to implement this.
• [x] Kindly consider updating the future features section of your README file. This will show that you are still maintaining the code and are looking to implement new features.

[Optional] In the video demonstration the task is only clicked once to enter "edit" mode, however yours requires a double click. Although it performs the same function, I'd suggest switching to a single click as this will greatly improve the UX of your program :smile:

[manzitresor]

Hi @DevaWinner Great job on implementing project requirements 🤝 . You have done great job .

Good Highlights✔️

• [ ] Design looks great
• [ ] Good project documentation in readme
• [ ] Good commit messages

As mentioned in above review feedback kindly consider working on mentioned changes to make your project looks more professional. Keep up good work!🎉