nus-se-bot
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
As a group, we don't think that use cases should be a comprehensive list of every feature in our application, but merely the important or complex features that have a lot of moving parts
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: The team's justification is incorrect as per this post by Prof here: https://github.com/nus-cs2103-AY2223S1/forum/issues/444
:question: Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Use-cases are meant to specify system requirements.
If as a developer, you forget to specify use-cases, it is possible that you might forget to implement those system requirements later on while building the application itself.
Your team only provided 6 use-cases. They do not cover multiple aspects of your program. Some of them include:
- Viewing all students in a tutorial group (pretty important)
- Grading an assignment - entire feature missing :(
If your team designed the application based on the use-cases in the DG alone, it would not add much value to the users as important feature and functionalities would have been left out.
Hence, it is a medium severity documentation bug as the number of missing use cases affects the final product significantly.
Some important use-cases such as: viewing students from tutorial group - are missing from the DG