Open Devanshshah1309 opened 1 year ago
No details provided by team.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: The dev team claims that this is not in scope but did not provide any justification.
The application is meant to be fast for users who can type fast since it uses CLI. Having unnecessarily long names for commands (where obvious short-forms are possible) should be considered within the scope of this version of the product.
The longer the commands, the less value the app brings to users - which should have been considered when thinking of user stories and use-cases.
Steps to Reproduce
Consider the command
tutorial add g/T01
Expected
Since this app is meant to be used via CLI, users want the commands to be short (and intuitive) as possible. We would expect a command like
tut add g/T01
(or eventa g/T01
- which can be identified to betutorial add
because of itsg
flag) to be present instead oftutorial add g/T01
.Low priority as it only takes a second to type those extra letters but definitely a bad UX for advanced users who don't want to type the entire command.