Open SebastianZ opened 2 years ago
I think this may be a little too fine grained? If we didn't have a limit in how many questions we could ask I'd say let's go for it, but participant attention is a finite resource so adding this would likely mean something else needs to be removed.
You're probably right. Though there were some questions about very specific features in last year's survey like font-display
, conic-gradient()
or pointer-events
. And at the same time, there are some features that already have a very high usage like calc()
or Flexbox, which may be removed from this year's survey.
Sebastian
You're probably right. Though there were some questions about very specific features in last year's survey like
font-display
,conic-gradient()
orpointer-events
.
I see these as larger features than scroll-snap-stop
(except pointer-events
).
And at the same time, there are some features that already have a very high usage like
calc()
or Flexbox, which may be removed from this year's survey.
Agreed. I had previously made that point, but this just reminded me to open a separate issue about it: #37
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#scroll-snap-stop MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/scroll-snap-stop
With Gecko having this implemented as the last engine, lately, maybe it's time to explicitly ask for that property (separately from Scroll Snap in general).
Sebastian