Closed aschoneveld closed 2 years ago
It should be possible to use public fields in adapters without having to specify a 'setter' or a 'getter' for the 'adapter'
I actually don't agree that this should be possible. Directly accessing public fields on a class is in general considered bad practice right?
@marte: agree.
It should be possible to use public fields in adapters without having to specify a 'setter' or a 'getter' for the 'adapter'